↓ Skip to main content

Histopathology

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Histopathology'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Gross Examination
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 The Pathologist’s Guide to Fixatives
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Tissue Processing and Hematoxylin and Eosin Staining
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Light Microscope Alignment Methods
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Immunohistochemistry in Surgical Pathology: Principles and Practice
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Optimizing Direct Immunofluorescence
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Electron Microscopy: A Brief History and Review of Current Clinical Application
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 A Practical Approach to Clinical and Research Biobanking
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Hospital Autopsy Performance and Reporting
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Characterization of HER2 Status by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) and Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Intraoperative Frozen Section Consultation in Gynecologic Pathology
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Processing Dermatological Biopsies
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Human Papillomavirus Testing in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Best Practice for Diagnosis
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Peripheral Blood Smears, Bone Marrow Aspiration, Trephine and Clot Biopsies: Methods and Protocols
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Processing the Lymph Node Biopsy
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Handling and Interpretation of Heart Transplant Biopsies
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Handling and Interpretation of Lung Transplant Biopsies
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Liver: tissue handling and evaluation.
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Handling and Interpretation of the Medical Renal Biopsy
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Optimizing Prostate Specimen Handling for Diagnosis and Prognosis
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Optimal Handling of Bone Tumor Specimens
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 CNS Intraoperative Consultation: A Survival Guide for Non-neuropathologists
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Examining and Processing Eye Specimens
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Optimizing the Skeletal Muscle Biopsy
Attention for Chapter 18: Liver: tissue handling and evaluation.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Liver: tissue handling and evaluation.
Chapter number 18
Book title
Histopathology
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-1050-2_18
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-1049-6, 978-1-4939-1050-2
Authors

Geller SA, Stephen A. Geller, Geller, Stephen A.

Abstract

Liver diseases remain among the most important causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although the diagnostic tools (e.g., blood studies, imaging, genetic and molecular tests) available to clinicians have greatly expanded in number and increased in sensitivity, the examination of liver tissue by a pathologist skilled and experienced in hepatopathology remains vitally important in the evaluation and care of the patient with liver abnormalities. In some disorders, such as autoimmune hepatitis, liver biopsy is considered mandatory. The indications for performing liver biopsies have changed over the years (e.g., large duct obstruction was a common diagnostic problem 50 years ago and is only uncommonly so currently). Liver samples come to the pathologist as aspiration biopsies for cytologic examination, tissue biopsies (fine needle, core, transjugular, and wedge), resections, and explants. Each demands slightly different approaches for optimal handling and evaluation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Other 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 42%
Psychology 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 5 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2015.
All research outputs
#20,262,276
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,898
of 13,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,951
of 226,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#45
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,110 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.