↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 17: Bacterial Amyloids
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Bacterial Amyloids
Chapter number 17
Book title
Amyloid Proteins
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7816-8_17
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7815-1, 978-1-4939-7816-8
Authors

Margery L. Evans, Elizabeth Gichana, Yizhou Zhou, Matthew R. Chapman, Evans, Margery L., Gichana, Elizabeth, Zhou, Yizhou, Chapman, Matthew R.

Abstract

Many bacteria can assemble functional amyloid fibers on their cell surface. Most bacterial amyloids contribute to biofilm or other community behaviors where cells interact with a surface or with other cells. Bacterial amyloids, like all functional amyloids, share structural and biochemical properties with disease-associated eukaryotic amyloids. The general ability of amyloids to bind specific dyes, like Congo red and Thioflavin T, and their resistance to denaturation have provided useful tools for scoring and quantifying bacterial amyloid formation. Here, we present basic approaches to study bacterial amyloids by focusing on the well-studied curli amyloid fibers expressed by Enterobacteriaceae. These methods exploit the specific tinctorial and biophysical properties of amyloids. The methods described here are straightforward and can be easily applied by any modern molecular biology lab for the study of other bacterial amyloids.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 19%
Student > Master 10 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 19 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 30%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 18 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,121,941
of 25,818,700 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#572
of 14,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,724
of 452,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#30
of 1,486 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,818,700 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,380 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,486 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.