↓ Skip to main content

Mass Spectrometry Data Analysis in Proteomics

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Mass Spectrometry Data Analysis in Proteomics'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Introduction to Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 LC-MS Spectra Processing
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Isotopic Distributions
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Retention Time Prediction and Protein Identification
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Algorithms for Database-Dependent Search of MS/MS Data
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Interpretation of Tandem Mass Spectra of Posttranslationally Modified Peptides
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Improving Peptide Identification Using Empirical Scoring Systems
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Methods and Algorithms for Quantitative Proteomics by Mass Spectrometry
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Computational Approaches to Selected Reaction Monitoring Assay Design
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Feature selection and machine learning with mass spectrometry data.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Considerations in the Analysis of Hydrogen Exchange Mass Spectrometry Data
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Permethylated N-glycan analysis with mass spectrometry.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Mass Spectrometry Methods for Studying Glycosylation in Cancer
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Proteomics data exchange and storage: the need for common standards and public repositories.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Tools for Protein Posttranslational Modifications Analysis: FAK, a Case Study
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Proteomic Strategies to Characterize Signaling Pathways
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Simple Proteomics Data Analysis in the Object-Oriented PowerShell
Attention for Chapter 14: Proteomics data exchange and storage: the need for common standards and public repositories.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Proteomics data exchange and storage: the need for common standards and public repositories.
Chapter number 14
Book title
Mass Spectrometry Data Analysis in Proteomics
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-392-3_14
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-62703-391-6, 978-1-62703-392-3
Authors

Rafael C. Jiménez, Juan Antonio Vizcaíno

Abstract

Both the existence of data standards and public databases or repositories have been key factors behind the development of the existing "omics" approaches. In this book chapter we first review the main existing mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics resources: PRIDE, PeptideAtlas, GPMDB, and Tranche. Second, we report on the current status of the different proteomics data standards developed by the Proteomics Standards Initiative (PSI): the formats mzML, mzIdentML, mzQuantML, TraML, and PSI-MI XML are then reviewed. Finally, we present an easy way to query and access MS proteomics data in the PRIDE database, as a representative of the existing repositories, using the workflow management system (WMS) tool Taverna. Two different publicly available workflows are explained and described.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 33%
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 25%
Computer Science 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2013.
All research outputs
#14,170,039
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,159
of 13,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,513
of 280,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#156
of 341 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,078 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 341 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.