↓ Skip to main content

“A stitch in time”… the scope for preventive strategies in early psychosis

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, March 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“A stitch in time”… the scope for preventive strategies in early psychosis
Published in
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, March 1998
DOI 10.1007/s004060050014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick D. McGorry

Abstract

Preventive endeavours in psychotic disorders have been hampered by many obstacles over the past century. One important barrier has been the corrosive pessimism which has attached to the treatment prospects for schizophrenia in particular since the time of Kraepelin, and the isolation of this disorder from progressive models of preventive intervention which operate in general health care. This paper outlines a rationale, logic and model for realistic preventive efforts in early psychosis, focusing on indicated prevention in the pre-psychotic phase and early intervention from the onset of frank psychotic symptoms through the early years of illness. The latter is discussed through a series of clinical challenges which will be familiar to clinicians during this phase of illness. The existing evidence is introduced and the gaps indicated. It is argued that the case for a preventive approach possesses more than face validity alone, and that momentum is building for a significant paradigm shift. If this to be securely based and durable, it will need to become increasingly evidence based and demonstrate cost-effectiveness. The nature of the evidence and the strategy for its assembly are also considered.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hong Kong 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 51 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Postgraduate 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 13 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2010.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#535
of 1,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,078
of 31,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.