↓ Skip to main content

Disposable Bioreactors II

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 233: Therapeutic Human Cells: Manufacture for Cell Therapy/Regenerative Medicine
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 133)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Therapeutic Human Cells: Manufacture for Cell Therapy/Regenerative Medicine
Chapter number 233
Book title
Disposable Bioreactors II
Published in
Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/10_2013_233
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-245157-7, 978-3-64-245158-4
Authors

Christian van den Bos, Robert Keefe, Carmen Schirmaier, Michael McCaman

Abstract

: Human primary cells (e.g. adult stem cells) as well as differentiated cells, including those of the immune system, have been found to be therapeutically useful and free of ethical concerns. Several products have received market authorization and numerous promising clinical trials are underway. We believe that such primary therapeutic cells will dominate the market for cell therapy applications for the foreseeable future. Consequently, production of such cellular products warrants attention and needs to be a fully controlled pharmaceutical process. Thus, where possible, such production should change from manufacture towards a truly scalable industrialized process for both allogeneic and autologous products. Here, we discuss manufacturing aspects of both autogeneic and allogeneic products, review the field, and provide historical context.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 7%
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 26 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 31%
Student > Bachelor 6 21%
Researcher 4 14%
Other 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 41%
Engineering 5 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 4 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2014.
All research outputs
#2,927,340
of 6,230,817 outputs
Outputs from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#42
of 133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,592
of 133,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,230,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 133 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them