↓ Skip to main content

Primary central nervous system lymphoma and atypical glioblastoma: Differentiation using radiomics approach

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Primary central nervous system lymphoma and atypical glioblastoma: Differentiation using radiomics approach
Published in
European Radiology, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00330-018-5368-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hie Bum Suh, Yoon Seong Choi, Sohi Bae, Sung Soo Ahn, Jong Hee Chang, Seok-Gu Kang, Eui Hyun Kim, Se Hoon Kim, Seung-Koo Lee

Abstract

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance (MR) radiomics-based machine-learning algorithms in differentiating primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) from non-necrotic atypical glioblastoma (GBM). Seventy-seven patients (54 individuals with PCNSL and 23 with non-necrotic atypical GBM), diagnosed from January 2009 to April 2017, were enrolled in this retrospective study. A total of 6,366 radiomics features, including shape, volume, first-order, texture, and wavelet-transformed features, were extracted from multi-parametric (post-contrast T1- and T2-weighted, and fluid attenuation inversion recovery images) and multiregional (enhanced and non-enhanced) tumour volumes. These features were subjected to recursive feature elimination and random forest (RF) analysis with nested cross-validation. The diagnostic abilities of a radiomics machine-learning classifier, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and three readers, who independently classified the tumours based on conventional MR sequences, were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Areas under the ROC curves (AUC) of the radiomics classifier, ADC value, and the radiologists were compared. The mean AUC of the radiomics classifier was 0.921 (95 % CI 0.825-0.990). The AUCs of the three readers and ADC were 0.707 (95 % CI 0.622-0.793), 0.759 (95 %CI 0.656-0.861), 0.695 (95 % CI 0.590-0.800) and 0.684 (95 % CI0.560-0.809), respectively. The AUC of the radiomics-based classifier was significantly higher than those of the three readers and ADC (p< 0.001 for all). Large-scale radiomics with a machine-learning algorithm can be useful for differentiating PCNSL from atypical GBM, and yields a better diagnostic performance than human radiologists and ADC values. • Machine-learning algorithm radiomics can help to differentiate primary central PCNSL from GBM. • This approach yields a higher diagnostic accuracy than visual analysis by radiologists. • Radiomics can strengthen radiologists' diagnostic decisions whenever conventional MRI sequences are available.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Postgraduate 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 26 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 9%
Neuroscience 7 8%
Computer Science 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 32 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2018.
All research outputs
#18,601,965
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#2,969
of 4,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,931
of 329,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#47
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,177 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.