↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of social-ecological resilience between two grassland management patterns driven by grassland land contract policy in the Maqu, Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau

Overview of attention for article published in Land Use Policy, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of social-ecological resilience between two grassland management patterns driven by grassland land contract policy in the Maqu, Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau
Published in
Land Use Policy, May 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.027
Authors

Jianjun Cao, Mengtian Li, Ravinesh C. Deo, Jan F. Adamowski, Artemi Cerdà, Qi Feng, Minxia Liu, Jian Zhang, Guofeng Zhu, Xuebin Zhang, Xueyun Xu, Shurong Yang, Yifan Gong

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 117 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 15%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 7 6%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 35 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 25 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 9%
Social Sciences 9 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 5%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 44 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2018.
All research outputs
#12,957,017
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Land Use Policy
#1,484
of 2,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,816
of 326,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Land Use Policy
#37
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.