↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of social-ecological resilience between two grassland management patterns driven by grassland land contract policy in the Maqu, Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau

Overview of attention for article published in Land Use Policy, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of social-ecological resilience between two grassland management patterns driven by grassland land contract policy in the Maqu, Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau
Published in
Land Use Policy, May 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.027
Authors

Jianjun Cao, Mengtian Li, Ravinesh C. Deo, Jan F. Adamowski, Artemi Cerdà, Qi Feng, Minxia Liu, Jian Zhang, Guofeng Zhu, Xuebin Zhang, Xueyun Xu, Shurong Yang, Yifan Gong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 123 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 7 6%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 39 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 27 22%
Social Sciences 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 3%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 48 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2018.
All research outputs
#14,479,843
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Land Use Policy
#1,715
of 2,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,271
of 339,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Land Use Policy
#42
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,724 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.