You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Comparison of social-ecological resilience between two grassland management patterns driven by grassland land contract policy in the Maqu, Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau
Land Use Policy, May 2018
Jianjun Cao, Mengtian Li, Ravinesh C. Deo, Jan F. Adamowski, Artemi Cerdà, Qi Feng, Minxia Liu, Jian Zhang, Guofeng Zhu, Xuebin Zhang, Xueyun Xu, Shurong Yang, Yifan Gong
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||4||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||17||15%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||12||10%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||8||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||10||9%|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||7||6%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||6||5%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2018.
All research outputs
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Land Use Policy
of 2,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 326,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Land Use Policy
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.