↓ Skip to main content

Dengue Virus Infection and Virus-Specific HLA-A2 Restricted Immune Responses in Humanized NOD-scid IL2rγnull Mice

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dengue Virus Infection and Virus-Specific HLA-A2 Restricted Immune Responses in Humanized NOD-scid IL2rγnull Mice
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0007251
Pubmed ID
Authors

Smita Jaiswal, Todd Pearson, Heather Friberg, Leonard D. Shultz, Dale L. Greiner, Alan L. Rothman, Anuja Mathew

Abstract

The lack of a suitable animal model to study viral and immunological mechanisms of human dengue disease has been a deterrent to dengue research.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
French Polynesia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 106 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 18%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Professor 7 6%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 14 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 14 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2009.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#88,766
of 194,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,270
of 93,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#270
of 532 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 532 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.