↓ Skip to main content

Description and Immediate Impacts of a Preventive Intervention for Conduct Problems

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Community Psychology, August 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
7 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Description and Immediate Impacts of a Preventive Intervention for Conduct Problems
Published in
American Journal of Community Psychology, August 1999
DOI 10.1023/a:1022181111368
Pubmed ID
Authors

John B. Reid, J. Mark Eddy, Rebecca Ann Fetrow, Mike Stoolmiller

Abstract

A population-based randomized intervention trial for the prevention of conduct problems (i.e., oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder) is described. The LIFT (Linking the Interests of Families and Teachers) intervention was designed for all first- and fifth-grade elementary school boys and girls and their families living in at-risk neighborhoods characterized by high rates of juvenile delinquency. The 10-week intervention strategy was carefully targeted at proximal and malleable antecedents in three social domains that were identified by a developmental model of conduct problems. From 12 elementary schools, 671 first and fifth graders and their families participated either in the theory-based universal preventive intervention or in a control condition. The intervention consisted of parent training, a classroom-based social skills program, a playground behavioral program, and systematic communication between teachers and parents. A multiple measure assessment strategy was used to evaluate participant satisfaction and participation, fidelity of implementation, and the immediate impacts of the program on targeted antecedents.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Unknown 153 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 22%
Student > Master 25 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 30 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 56 35%
Social Sciences 35 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 40 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2017.
All research outputs
#1,742,348
of 25,450,869 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Community Psychology
#81
of 1,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#881
of 34,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Community Psychology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,450,869 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.