↓ Skip to main content

Defects in the Leukocyte Adhesion Cascade

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Defects in the Leukocyte Adhesion Cascade
Published in
Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12016-009-8132-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amos Etzioni

Abstract

Leukocyte trafficking from bloodstream to tissue is important for the continuous surveillance for foreign antigens as well as for rapid leukocyte accumulation at sites of inflammatory response or tissue injury. Leukocyte interaction with vascular endothelial cells is a pivotal event in the inflammatory response and is mediated by several families of adhesion molecules. The crucial role of the beta(2)-integrin subfamily in leukocyte emigration was established after leukocyte adhesion deficiency (LAD) I was discovered. Patients with this disorder suffer from life-threatening bacterial infections, and in its severe form, death usually occurs in early childhood unless bone marrow transplantation is performed. The LAD II disorder clarifies the role of the selectin receptors and their fucosylated ligands. Clinically, patients with LAD II suffer not only from a less severe form of infectious episodes resembling the moderate phenotype of LAD I but also from severe psychomotor and growth retardation. LAD III emphasizes the importance of the integrin-activation phase in the adhesion cascade. All hematopoietic integrin activation processes are defective, which lead to severe infection as observed in LAD I and to marked increase tendency for bleeding problems (defective activation of beta(1), beta(2), and beta(3) integrins). The various genetic defects leading to all adhesion molecules syndrome will be discussed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 64 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 12%
Student > Master 8 12%
Researcher 8 12%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 15%
Engineering 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 9 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2011.
All research outputs
#7,967,425
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#327
of 690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,040
of 95,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.