You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bright Field Microscopy as an Alternative to Whole Cell Fluorescence in Automated Analysis of Macrophage Images
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0007497 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jyrki Selinummi, Pekka Ruusuvuori, Irina Podolsky, Adrian Ozinsky, Elizabeth Gold, Olli Yli-Harja, Alan Aderem, Ilya Shmulevich |
| Abstract |
Fluorescence microscopy is the standard tool for detection and analysis of cellular phenomena. This technique, however, has a number of drawbacks such as the limited number of available fluorescent channels in microscopes, overlapping excitation and emission spectra of the stains, and phototoxicity. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 2 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 3% |
| Unknown | 244 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 59 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 40 | 15% |
| Unknown | 45 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 23% |
| Computer Science | 32 | 12% |
| Engineering | 27 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 46 | 17% |
| Unknown | 58 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,160,958
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#42,094
of 205,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,983
of 96,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#113
of 553 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 205,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 553 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.