You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
MicroRNA Fingerprints Identify miR-150 as a Plasma Prognostic Marker in Patients with Sepsis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0007405 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Catalin Vasilescu, Simona Rossi, Masayoshi Shimizu, Stefan Tudor, Angelo Veronese, Manuela Ferracin, Milena S. Nicoloso, Elisa Barbarotto, Monica Popa, Oana Stanciulea, Michael H. Fernandez, Dan Tulbure, Carlos E. Bueso-Ramos, Massimo Negrini, George A. Calin |
| Abstract |
The physiopathology of sepsis continues to be poorly understood, and despite recent advances in its management, sepsis is still a life-threatening condition with a poor outcome. If new diagnostic markers related to sepsis pathogenesis will be identified, new specific therapies might be developed and mortality reduced. Small regulatory non-coding RNAs, microRNAs (miRNAs), were recently linked to various diseases; the aim of our prospective study was to identify miRNAs that can differentiate patients with early-stage sepsis from healthy controls and to determine if miRNA levels correlate with the severity assessed by the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 181 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 45 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 20% |
| Unknown | 24 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 30 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,054,680
of 23,479,361 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#40,713
of 201,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,764
of 95,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#114
of 545 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,479,361 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 545 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.