↓ Skip to main content

Shape casting: A tribute to Prof. John Campbell foreword

Overview of attention for article published in Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Shape casting: A tribute to Prof. John Campbell foreword
Published in
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, December 2006
DOI 10.1007/bf02735005
Authors

Murat Tiryakioglu, Paul N. Crepeau

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 67%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 1 33%
Chemistry 1 33%
Engineering 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B
#107
of 663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,537
of 155,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 663 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.