You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Molecular Genetic Timescale for the Diversification of Autotrophic Stramenopiles (Ochrophyta): Substantive Underestimation of Putative Fossil Ages
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0012759 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joseph W. Brown, Ulf Sorhannus |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 119 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Professor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 27 | 20% |
| Unknown | 12 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 86 | 62% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 19 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2024.
All research outputs
#6,950,322
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#82,144
of 194,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,068
of 85,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#480
of 916 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 916 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.