↓ Skip to main content

Regulation of Inspiratory Neuromuscular Output during Synchronized Intermittent Mechanical Ventilation

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesiology, January 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regulation of Inspiratory Neuromuscular Output during Synchronized Intermittent Mechanical Ventilation
Published in
Anesthesiology, January 1994
DOI 10.1097/00000542-199401000-00006
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Imsand, F. Feihl, C. Perret, J. W. Fitting

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 7%
Canada 1 7%
Unknown 13 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Professor 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Computer Science 1 7%
Neuroscience 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2024.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesiology
#3,006
of 6,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,495
of 71,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesiology
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.