↓ Skip to main content

Cancer physics: diagnostics based on damped cellular elastoelectrical vibrations in microtubules

Overview of attention for article published in European Biophysics Journal, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cancer physics: diagnostics based on damped cellular elastoelectrical vibrations in microtubules
Published in
European Biophysics Journal, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00249-011-0688-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiří Pokorný, Clarbruno Vedruccio, Michal Cifra, Ondřej Kučera

Abstract

This paper describes a proposed biophysical mechanism of a novel diagnostic method for cancer detection developed recently by Vedruccio. The diagnostic method is based on frequency selective absorption of electromagnetic waves by malignant tumors. Cancer is connected with mitochondrial malfunction (the Warburg effect) suggesting disrupted physical mechanisms. In addition to decreased energy conversion and nonutilized energy efflux, mitochondrial malfunction is accompanied by other negative effects in the cell. Diminished proton space charge layer and the static electric field around the outer membrane result in a lowered ordering level of cellular water and increased damping of microtubule-based cellular elastoelectrical vibration states. These changes manifest themselves in a dip in the amplitude of the signal with the fundamental frequency of the nonlinear microwave oscillator-the core of the diagnostic device-when coupled to the investigated cancerous tissue via the near-field. The dip is not present in the case of healthy tissue.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 44 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 19%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 13 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 38%
Physics and Astronomy 8 17%
Engineering 6 13%
Unspecified 6 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Other 4 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,418,033
of 13,218,768 outputs
Outputs from European Biophysics Journal
#51
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,037
of 278,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Biophysics Journal
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,218,768 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them