You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
OGAMA (Open Gaze and Mouse Analyzer): Open-source software designed to analyze eye and mouse movements in slideshow study designs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Behavior Research Methods, November 2008
|
| DOI | 10.3758/brm.40.4.1150 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adrian Voßkühler, Volkhard Nordmeier, Lars Kuchinke, Arthur M. Jacobs |
| Abstract |
In the present article, a new software is introduced that allows the recording and analyzing of eye- and mouse-tracking data from slideshow-based experiments in parallel. The Open Gaze and Mouse Analyzer (OGAMA) is written in C#.NET and has been released as an open-source project. Its main features include slideshow design, the recording of gaze and mouse data, database-driven preprocessing and filtering of gaze and mouse data, the creation of attention maps, areas-of-interest definition, and replay. Eyetracking and/or presentation soft- and hardware recordings in ASCII format can be imported. Data output is provided that can be used directly with different statistical software packages. Because it is open source, one can easily adapt it to suit one's needs. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 148 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 16% |
| Researcher | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 19% |
| Unknown | 23 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 41 | 25% |
| Psychology | 29 | 17% |
| Engineering | 15 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 30 | 18% |
| Unknown | 37 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Research Methods
#1,037
of 2,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,392
of 105,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Research Methods
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them