Title |
Atomic force microscopy analysis of nanoparticles in non-ideal conditions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Discover Nano, August 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1556-276x-6-514 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Petr Klapetek, Miroslav Valtr, David Nečas, Ota Salyk, Petr Dzik |
Abstract |
Nanoparticles are often measured using atomic force microscopy or other scanning probe microscopy methods. For isolated nanoparticles on flat substrates, this is a relatively easy task. However, in real situations, we often need to analyze nanoparticles on rough substrates or nanoparticles that are not isolated. In this article, we present a simple model for realistic simulations of nanoparticle deposition and we employ this model for modeling nanoparticles on rough substrates. Different modeling conditions (coverage, relaxation after deposition) and convolution with different tip shapes are used to obtain a wide spectrum of virtual AFM nanoparticle images similar to those known from practice. Statistical parameters of nanoparticles are then analyzed using different data processing algorithms in order to show their systematic errors and to estimate uncertainties for atomic force microscopy analysis of nanoparticles under non-ideal conditions. It is shown that the elimination of user influence on the data processing algorithm is a key step for obtaining accurate results while analyzing nanoparticles measured in non-ideal conditions. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Russia | 2 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 186 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 24% |
Researcher | 36 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 10% |
Student > Master | 19 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 4% |
Other | 24 | 12% |
Unknown | 40 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Physics and Astronomy | 40 | 21% |
Chemistry | 28 | 15% |
Materials Science | 22 | 11% |
Engineering | 18 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 6% |
Other | 24 | 12% |
Unknown | 50 | 26% |