↓ Skip to main content

The Nature Index: A General Framework for Synthesizing Knowledge on the State of Biodiversity

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Nature Index: A General Framework for Synthesizing Knowledge on the State of Biodiversity
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0018930
Pubmed ID
Authors

Grégoire Certain, Olav Skarpaas, Jarle-Werner Bjerke, Erik Framstad, Markus Lindholm, Jan-Erik Nilsen, Ann Norderhaug, Eivind Oug, Hans-Christian Pedersen, Ann-Kristin Schartau, Gro I. van der Meeren, Iulie Aslaksen, Steinar Engen, Per-Arild Garnåsjordet, Pål Kvaløy, Magnar Lillegård, Nigel G. Yoccoz, Signe Nybø

Abstract

The magnitude and urgency of the biodiversity crisis is widely recognized within scientific and political organizations. However, a lack of integrated measures for biodiversity has greatly constrained the national and international response to the biodiversity crisis. Thus, integrated biodiversity indexes will greatly facilitate information transfer from science toward other areas of human society. The Nature Index framework samples scientific information on biodiversity from a variety of sources, synthesizes this information, and then transmits it in a simplified form to environmental managers, policymakers, and the public. The Nature Index optimizes information use by incorporating expert judgment, monitoring-based estimates, and model-based estimates. The index relies on a network of scientific experts, each of whom is responsible for one or more biodiversity indicators. The resulting set of indicators is supposed to represent the best available knowledge on the state of biodiversity and ecosystems in any given area. The value of each indicator is scaled relative to a reference state, i.e., a predicted value assessed by each expert for a hypothetical undisturbed or sustainably managed ecosystem. Scaled indicator values can be aggregated or disaggregated over different axes representing spatiotemporal dimensions or thematic groups. A range of scaling models can be applied to allow for different ways of interpreting the reference states, e.g., optimal situations or minimum sustainable levels. Statistical testing for differences in space or time can be implemented using Monte-Carlo simulations. This study presents the Nature Index framework and details its implementation in Norway. The results suggest that the framework is a functional, efficient, and pragmatic approach for gathering and synthesizing scientific knowledge on the state of biodiversity in any marine or terrestrial ecosystem and has general applicability worldwide.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 3%
France 5 2%
Norway 4 2%
Colombia 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 186 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 64 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 17%
Student > Master 32 14%
Professor 14 6%
Other 12 5%
Other 43 19%
Unknown 20 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 94 42%
Environmental Science 59 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 4%
Engineering 7 3%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 32 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,591,746
of 23,685,936 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#32,765
of 202,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,603
of 111,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#257
of 1,486 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,685,936 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,486 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.