↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of Wildlife Underpasses and Fencing to Reduce Wildlife–Vehicle Collisions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Management, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of Wildlife Underpasses and Fencing to Reduce Wildlife–Vehicle Collisions
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Management, November 2010
DOI 10.2193/2009-535
Authors

Matthew F. McCollister, Frank T. van Manen

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Canada 3 2%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 155 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 26%
Student > Master 39 23%
Other 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 11 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 92 55%
Environmental Science 47 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 11 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,914,958
of 15,634,343 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#577
of 1,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,464
of 332,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#17
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,634,343 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.