You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reliability analysis of the Ahringer Caenorhabditis elegans RNAi feeding library: a guide for genome-wide screens
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-12-170 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wubin Qu, Changhong Ren, Yuan Li, Jinping Shi, Jiye Zhang, Xiaolei Wang, Xingyi Hang, Yiming Lu, Dongsheng Zhao, Chenggang Zhang |
| Abstract |
The Ahringer C. elegans RNAi feeding library prepared by cloning genomic DNA fragments has been widely used in genome-wide analysis of gene function. However, the library has not been thoroughly validated by direct sequencing, and there are potential errors, including: 1) mis-annotation (the clone with the retired gene name should be remapped to the actual target gene); 2) nonspecific PCR amplification; 3) cross-RNAi; 4) mis-operation such as sample loading error, etc. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 49% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 25% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2013.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,597
of 10,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,031
of 109,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#17
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,647 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.