↓ Skip to main content

Evidence for Significant Overlap between Common Risk Variants for Crohn's Disease and Ankylosing Spondylitis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence for Significant Overlap between Common Risk Variants for Crohn's Disease and Ankylosing Spondylitis
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0013795
Pubmed ID
Authors

Debby Laukens, Michel Georges, Cécile Libioulle, Cynthia Sandor, Myriam Mni, Bert Vander Cruyssen, Harald Peeters, Dirk Elewaut, Martine De Vos

Abstract

A multicenter genome-wide association scan for Crohn's Disease (CD) has recently reported 40 CD susceptibility loci, including 29 novel ones (19 significant and 10 putative). To gain insight into the genetic overlap between CD and ankylosing spondylitis (AS), these markers were tested for association in AS patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
Spain 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 65 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 20%
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Professor 5 7%
Other 15 22%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 9 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#88,772
of 194,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,004
of 100,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#548
of 972 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 972 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.