↓ Skip to main content

Gene Expression Analysis of Forskolin Treated Basilar Papillae Identifies MicroRNA181a as a Mediator of Proliferation

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gene Expression Analysis of Forskolin Treated Basilar Papillae Identifies MicroRNA181a as a Mediator of Proliferation
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0011502
Pubmed ID
Authors

Corey S. Frucht, Mohamed Uduman, Jamie L. Duke, Steven H. Kleinstein, Joseph Santos-Sacchi, Dhasakumar S. Navaratnam

Abstract

Auditory hair cells spontaneously regenerate following injury in birds but not mammals. A better understanding of the molecular events underlying hair cell regeneration in birds may allow for identification and eventually manipulation of relevant pathways in mammals to stimulate regeneration and restore hearing in deaf patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 3%
South Africa 1 3%
Unknown 37 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 44%
Other 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 4 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2013.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#88,772
of 194,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,752
of 94,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#397
of 719 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 719 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.