↓ Skip to main content

Entangled-photon decision maker

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Entangled-photon decision maker
Published in
Scientific Reports, August 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-48647-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolas Chauvet, David Jegouso, Benoît Boulanger, Hayato Saigo, Kazuya Okamura, Hirokazu Hori, Aurélien Drezet, Serge Huant, Guillaume Bachelier, Makoto Naruse

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 4 44%
Psychology 1 11%
Computer Science 1 11%
Social Sciences 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,917,842
of 13,927,501 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#24,233
of 70,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,152
of 276,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,927,501 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 70,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them