You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Entangled-photon decision maker
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-48647-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicolas Chauvet, David Jegouso, Benoît Boulanger, Hayato Saigo, Kazuya Okamura, Hirokazu Hori, Aurélien Drezet, Serge Huant, Guillaume Bachelier, Makoto Naruse |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| Germany | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 26% |
| Engineering | 3 | 13% |
| Psychology | 2 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,439,588
of 24,002,307 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#50,271
of 130,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,923
of 345,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,358
of 3,422 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,002,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 130,271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,422 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.