↓ Skip to main content

Comparative Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Idiopathic Ulnar Impaction Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Idiopathic Ulnar Impaction Syndrome
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11999-013-2843-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jae Kwang Kim, Eun Soo Park

Abstract

Patient-reported questionnaires have been widely used to predict symptom severity and functional disability in musculoskeletal disease. Importantly, questionnaires can detect clinical changes in patients; however, this impact has not been determined for ulnar impaction syndrome.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 59 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 24%
Researcher 11 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Other 4 6%
Lecturer 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 13%
Engineering 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 14 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2013.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#2,440
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,093
of 296,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#53
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.