↓ Skip to main content

Phylogenetic Relationships of Palaearctic Formica Species (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) Based on Mitochondrial Cytochrome b Sequences

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phylogenetic Relationships of Palaearctic Formica Species (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) Based on Mitochondrial Cytochrome b Sequences
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0041697
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna V. Goropashnaya, Vadim B. Fedorov, Bernhard Seifert, Pekka Pamilo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
United Kingdom 2 3%
United States 2 3%
Spain 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 64 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 29%
Student > Master 8 11%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 16 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 10%
Environmental Science 4 6%
Linguistics 1 1%
Engineering 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 17 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2022.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#119,035
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,208
of 181,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,745
of 4,023 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,023 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.