↓ Skip to main content

Successful Isolation of Infectious and High Titer Human Monocyte-Derived HIV-1 from Two Subjects with Discontinued Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Successful Isolation of Infectious and High Titer Human Monocyte-Derived HIV-1 from Two Subjects with Discontinued Therapy
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0065071
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tong Wang, Younong Xu, Haiying Zhu, Thomas Andrus, Sergei B. Ivanov, Charlotte Pan, Jazel Dolores, Gregory C. Dann, Michael Zhou, Dominic Forte, Zihuan Yang, Sarah Holte, Lawrence Corey, Tuofu Zhu

Abstract

HIV-1 DNA in blood monocytes is considered a viral source of various HIV-1 infected tissue macrophages, which is also known as "Trojan horse" hypothesis. However, whether these DNA can produce virions has been an open question for years, due to the inability of isolating high titer and infectious HIV-1 directly from monocytes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Puerto Rico 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Other 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 5 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2021.
All research outputs
#15,237,882
of 25,473,687 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#133,881
of 221,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,835
of 207,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,612
of 4,770 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,473,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 221,918 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,770 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.