You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Age and Grip Strength Predict Hand Dexterity in Adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0117598 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jason A. Martin, Jill Ramsay, Christopher Hughes, Derek M. Peters, Martin G. Edwards |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Austria | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 243 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 52 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 40 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 11% |
| Researcher | 16 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 31 | 13% |
| Unknown | 69 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 12% |
| Sports and Recreations | 27 | 11% |
| Engineering | 15 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 19% |
| Unknown | 85 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2019.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#119,035
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,286
of 272,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,643
of 4,385 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,385 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.