You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Are conservation organizations configured for effective adaptation to global change?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, April 2015
|
DOI | 10.1890/130352 |
Authors |
Paul R Armsworth, Eric R Larson, Stephen T Jackson, Dov F Sax, Paul Simonin, Bernd Blossey, Nancy Green, Mary L Klein, Liza Lester, Taylor H Ricketts, Michael C Runge, M Rebecca Shaw |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 30% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
Spain | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 4% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 147 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 45 | 28% |
Student > Master | 25 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 15% |
Other | 14 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 6% |
Other | 24 | 15% |
Unknown | 17 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 61 | 39% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 32% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Engineering | 4 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 5% |
Unknown | 26 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2017.
All research outputs
#2,295,913
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#671
of 1,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,000
of 279,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.