You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Linking salinity stress tolerance with tissue-specific Na+ sequestration in wheat roots
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2015.00071 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Honghong Wu, Lana Shabala, Xiaohui Liu, Elisa Azzarello, Meixue Zhou, Camilla Pandolfi, Zhong-Hua Chen, Jayakumar Bose, Stefano Mancuso, Sergey Shabala |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 91 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 26% |
| Researcher | 18 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 54 | 59% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2015.
All research outputs
#15,500,278
of 25,880,948 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#7,958
of 24,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,988
of 269,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#78
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,948 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,954 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.