↓ Skip to main content

Subchronic inhalation toxicity of gold nanoparticles

Overview of attention for article published in Particle and Fibre Toxicology, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 556)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Subchronic inhalation toxicity of gold nanoparticles
Published in
Particle and Fibre Toxicology, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/1743-8977-8-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jae Hyuck Sung, Jun Ho Ji, Jung Duck Park, Moon Yong Song, Kyung Seuk Song, Hyeon Ryol Ryu, Jin Uk Yoon, Ki Soo Jeon, Jayoung Jeong, Beom Seok Han, Yong Hyun Chung, Hee Kyung Chang, Ji Hyun Lee, Dong Won Kim, Bruce J Kelman, Il Je Yu

Abstract

Gold nanoparticles are widely used in consumer products, including cosmetics, food packaging, beverages, toothpaste, automobiles, and lubricants. With this increase in consumer products containing gold nanoparticles, the potential for worker exposure to gold nanoparticles will also increase. Only a few studies have produced data on the in vivo toxicology of gold nanoparticles, meaning that the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) of gold nanoparticles remain unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 139 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 23%
Researcher 27 18%
Student > Master 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Other 9 6%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 19%
Chemistry 26 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 6%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 32 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,347,061
of 22,464,753 outputs
Outputs from Particle and Fibre Toxicology
#40
of 556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,067
of 97,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Particle and Fibre Toxicology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,464,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them