You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Loop diuretics for patients receiving blood transfusions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010138.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michael Sarai, Aaron M Tejani |
Abstract |
Blood transfusions are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Prophylactic administration of loop diuretics (furosemide, bumetanide, ethacrynic acid, or torsemide) is common practice, especially among people who are at risk for circulatory overload, pulmonary oedema or both. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 4 | 29% |
Morocco | 1 | 7% |
Australia | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 86% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 197 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 25 | 13% |
Student > Master | 22 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 9% |
Researcher | 15 | 8% |
Other | 13 | 7% |
Other | 35 | 18% |
Unknown | 70 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 35% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 17 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 9% |
Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 2% |
Other | 14 | 7% |
Unknown | 73 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,063,696
of 25,460,914 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,362
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,383
of 271,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#96
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.