↓ Skip to main content

Loop diuretics for patients receiving blood transfusions

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Loop diuretics for patients receiving blood transfusions
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010138.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Sarai, Aaron M Tejani

Abstract

Blood transfusions are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Prophylactic administration of loop diuretics (furosemide, bumetanide, ethacrynic acid, or torsemide) is common practice, especially among people who are at risk for circulatory overload, pulmonary oedema or both.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Postgraduate 13 11%
Other 10 9%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 18 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 24 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,110,849
of 15,426,370 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,087
of 11,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,793
of 217,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#81
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,426,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,178 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.