You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diagnosis and management of xerostomia and hyposalivation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/tcrm.s76282 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alessandro Villa, Christopher L Connell, Silvio Abati |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 40% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Japan | 1 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 707 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 706 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 124 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 93 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 49 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 4% |
| Other | 113 | 16% |
| Unknown | 261 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 289 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 22 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 2% |
| Other | 53 | 7% |
| Unknown | 281 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2023.
All research outputs
#752,660
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#33
of 1,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,195
of 371,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.