Small Amounts of Gluten in Subjects with Suspected Nonceliac Gluten Sensitivity: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Cross-Over Trial.

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 1,584)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
876 tweeters
facebook
242 Facebook pages
googleplus
13 Google+ users
reddit
12 Redditors
video
1 video uploader

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Small Amounts of Gluten in Subjects with Suspected Nonceliac Gluten Sensitivity: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Cross-Over Trial.
Published in
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, February 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.01.029
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Di Sabatino, Umberto Volta, Chiara Salvatore, Paolo Biancheri, Giacomo Caio, Roberto De Giorgio, Michele Di Stefano, Gino R Corazza, Di Sabatino A, Volta U, Salvatore C, Biancheri P, Caio G, De Giorgio R, Di Stefano M, Corazza GR, Gino R. Corazza

Abstract

There is debate over the existence of nonceliac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) -intestinal and extra-intestinal symptoms in response to ingestion of gluten-containing foods by people without celiac disease or wheat allergy. We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial to determine the effects of administration of low doses of gluten to subjects with suspected NCGS.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 876 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Spain 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 95 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 28%
Student > Bachelor 20 19%
Other 10 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Other 29 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 51%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 21%
Sports and Recreations 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 15 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 921. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2017.
All research outputs
#1,663
of 7,430,852 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
#1
of 1,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84
of 202,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
#1
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,430,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.