↓ Skip to main content

Variation in bacterial, archaeal and fungal community structure and abundance in High Arctic tundra soil

Overview of attention for article published in Polar Biology, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Variation in bacterial, archaeal and fungal community structure and abundance in High Arctic tundra soil
Published in
Polar Biology, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00300-015-1661-8
Authors

Aimeric Blaud, Gareth K. Phoenix, A. Mark Osborn

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Belgium 1 4%
Unknown 22 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 33%
Student > Master 5 21%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 17%
Environmental Science 3 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2015.
All research outputs
#6,177,030
of 12,226,820 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#543
of 897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,561
of 224,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#14
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,226,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.