↓ Skip to main content

N-Terminal Pro–B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Variability in Stable Dialysis Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
N-Terminal Pro–B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Variability in Stable Dialysis Patients
Published in
Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology, February 2015
DOI 10.2215/cjn.09060914
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magid A. Fahim, Andrew Hayen, Andrea R. Horvath, Goce Dimeski, Amanda Coburn, David W. Johnson, Carmel M. Hawley, Scott B. Campbell, Jonathan C. Craig

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Other 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 10 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2015.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology
#3,475
of 4,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,352
of 269,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology
#52
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.