You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Barriers to Social Participation among Lonely Older Adults: The Influence of Social Fears and Identity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0116664 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Johanna C. Goll, Georgina Charlesworth, Katrina Scior, Joshua Stott |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| Cambodia | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Estonia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 300 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 12% |
| Researcher | 34 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 8% |
| Other | 40 | 13% |
| Unknown | 78 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 62 | 20% |
| Psychology | 47 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 40 | 13% |
| Unknown | 90 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#718,069
of 25,832,559 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#9,552
of 225,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,555
of 270,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#184
of 4,745 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,832,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,745 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.