↓ Skip to main content

Exercise training intensity prescription in breast cancer survivors: validity of current practice and specific recommendations

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Survivorship, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exercise training intensity prescription in breast cancer survivors: validity of current practice and specific recommendations
Published in
Journal of Cancer Survivorship, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11764-015-0437-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Friederike Scharhag-Rosenberger, Rea Kuehl, Oliver Klassen, Kai Schommer, Martina E. Schmidt, Cornelia M. Ulrich, Joachim Wiskemann, Karen Steindorf

Abstract

Cancer survivors are recommended to perform 150 min/week of moderate or 75 min/week of vigorous aerobic exercise, but it remains unclear how moderate and vigorous intensities can be prescribed. Therefore, it was investigated whether and how intensity prescriptions for healthy adults by the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) need to be adapted for breast cancer survivors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 192 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 12%
Student > Master 24 12%
Researcher 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 54 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 48 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 65 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2022.
All research outputs
#4,087,633
of 25,257,066 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#299
of 1,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,519
of 261,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,257,066 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.