You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Promoting and sustaining a historical and global effort to prevent sepsis: the 2018 World Health Organization SAVE LIVES: Clean Your Hands campaign
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, April 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-018-2011-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Romain Martischang, Daniela Pires, Sarah Masson-Roy, Hiroki Saito, Didier Pittet |
Abstract |
Sepsis is estimated to affect more than 30 million patients with potentially five million deaths every year worldwide. Prevention of sepsis, as well as early recognition, diagnosis and treatment, can't be overlooked to mitigate this global public health threat. World Health Organization (WHO) promotes hand hygiene in health care through its annual global campaign, SAVE LIVES: Clean Your Hands campaign on 5 May every year. The 2018 campaign targets sepsis with the overall theme "It's in your hands; prevent sepsis in health care". |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 8 | 28% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 14% |
United States | 3 | 10% |
Mexico | 2 | 7% |
Argentina | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 9 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 19 | 66% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 21% |
Scientists | 4 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 6 | 13% |
Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
Researcher | 3 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 13% |
Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 31% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 13% |
Unknown | 21 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2018.
All research outputs
#1,846,719
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,649
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,099
of 342,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#49
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.