↓ Skip to main content

Influence of duty cycle on the time course of muscle fatigue and the onset of neuromuscular compensation during exhaustive dynamic isolated limb exercise

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative & Comparative Physiology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Influence of duty cycle on the time course of muscle fatigue and the onset of neuromuscular compensation during exhaustive dynamic isolated limb exercise
Published in
American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative & Comparative Physiology, April 2015
DOI 10.1152/ajpregu.00356.2014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher W Sundberg, Matthew W Bundle

Abstract

We investigated the influence of altered muscle duty cycle on the performance decrements and neuromuscular responses occurring during constant-load, fatiguing bouts of knee extension exercise. We experimentally altered the durations of the muscularly inactive portion of the limb movement cycle, and hypothesized that greater relative durations of inactivity within the same movement task would 1) reduce the rates and extent of muscle performance loss and 2) increase the forces necessary to trigger muscle fatigue. In each condition (Duty Cycle=0.6 & 0.3), male subjects (age = 25.9±2.0 yr(SEM); mass = 85.4±2.6 kg), completed 9-11 exhaustive bouts of two-legged knee extension exercise, at force outputs that elicited failure between 4 and 290 s. The novel duty cycle manipulation produced two primary results; first, we observed two-fold differences in both the extent of muscle performance lost (DC0.6=761±35 N vs DC0.3=366±49 N) and the time course of performance loss. For example, exhaustive trials at the midpoint of these force ranges differed in duration by more than 30 s (t0.6=36±2.6 vs t0.3=67±4.3 s). Second, both the minimum forces necessary to exceed the peak aerobic capacity and initiate a reliance on anaerobic metabolism, and the forces necessary to elicit compensatory increases in EMG were 300% greater in the lower vs higher duty cycle condition. These results indicate that the fatigue-induced compensatory behavior to recruit additional motor units is triggered by a reliance on anaerobic metabolism for ATP resynthesis, and is independent of the absolute level or fraction of the maximum force produced by the muscle.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Student > Master 11 16%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 20 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 14 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 23 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,031,685
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative & Comparative Physiology
#645
of 2,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,972
of 279,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative & Comparative Physiology
#9
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.