Title |
Over my fake body: body ownership illusions for studying the multisensory basis of own-body perception
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00141 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Konstantina Kilteni, Antonella Maselli, Konrad P. Kording, Mel Slater |
Abstract |
Which is my body and how do I distinguish it from the bodies of others, or from objects in the surrounding environment? The perception of our own body and more particularly our sense of body ownership is taken for granted. Nevertheless, experimental findings from body ownership illusions (BOIs), show that under specific multisensory conditions, we can experience artificial body parts or fake bodies as our own body parts or body, respectively. The aim of the present paper is to discuss how and why BOIs are induced. We review several experimental findings concerning the spatial, temporal, and semantic principles of crossmodal stimuli that have been applied to induce BOIs. On the basis of these principles, we discuss theoretical approaches concerning the underlying mechanism of BOIs. We propose a conceptualization based on Bayesian causal inference for addressing how our nervous system could infer whether an object belongs to our own body, using multisensory, sensorimotor, and semantic information, and we discuss how this can account for several experimental findings. Finally, we point to neural network models as an implementational framework within which the computational problem behind BOIs could be addressed in the future. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 8% |
Japan | 3 | 6% |
United States | 3 | 6% |
Switzerland | 2 | 4% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Chile | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 33 | 66% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 32 | 64% |
Scientists | 9 | 18% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 3 | <1% |
Italy | 2 | <1% |
Japan | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | <1% |
Unknown | 622 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 126 | 20% |
Student > Master | 91 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 77 | 12% |
Researcher | 73 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 41 | 6% |
Other | 94 | 15% |
Unknown | 136 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 178 | 28% |
Neuroscience | 79 | 12% |
Computer Science | 63 | 10% |
Engineering | 44 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 3% |
Other | 91 | 14% |
Unknown | 162 | 25% |