↓ Skip to main content

Psychological and pharmacological interventions for depression in patients with coronary artery disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
175 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychological and pharmacological interventions for depression in patients with coronary artery disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008012.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harald Baumeister, Nico Hutter, Jürgen Bengel

Abstract

Depression occurs frequently in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and is associated with a poor prognosis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 184 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 19%
Student > Master 32 17%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Researcher 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Other 39 21%
Unknown 22 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 37%
Psychology 43 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 10%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 29 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2012.
All research outputs
#5,416,453
of 17,349,416 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,937
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,615
of 84,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,349,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.