↓ Skip to main content

Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
117 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
291 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
339 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006936.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola Lindson‐Hawley, Tom P Thompson, Rachna Begh

Abstract

Motivational Interviewing (MI) is a directive patient-centred style of counselling, designed to help people to explore and resolve ambivalence about behaviour change. It was developed as a treatment for alcohol abuse, but may help people to a make a successful attempt to quit smoking.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 117 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 339 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Romania 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 337 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 15%
Student > Bachelor 42 12%
Researcher 38 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 9%
Other 68 20%
Unknown 73 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 106 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 56 17%
Psychology 39 12%
Social Sciences 17 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Other 28 8%
Unknown 85 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2020.
All research outputs
#409,669
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#718
of 11,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,743
of 271,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.