↓ Skip to main content

Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
129 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006936.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola Lindson-Hawley, Tom P Thompson, Rachna Begh

Abstract

Motivational Interviewing (MI) is a directive patient-centred style of counselling, designed to help people to explore and resolve ambivalence about behaviour change. It was developed as a treatment for alcohol abuse, but may help people to a make a successful attempt to quit smoking.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 129 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 243 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 17%
Student > Bachelor 33 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 13%
Researcher 28 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 10%
Other 52 21%
Unknown 33 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 16%
Psychology 36 15%
Social Sciences 17 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 38 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2020.
All research outputs
#185,935
of 15,356,158 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#391
of 11,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,390
of 217,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,356,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.