↓ Skip to main content

Nitric oxide donors for cervical ripening in first-trimester surgical abortion

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nitric oxide donors for cervical ripening in first-trimester surgical abortion
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007444.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patama Promsonthi, Anyarin Preechapornprasert, Boonsri Chanrachakul

Abstract

Cervical priming before first-trimester surgical abortion is recommended in certain groups of women. Nitric oxide (NO) donors induce cervical ripening without uterine contractions, but the efficacy and side effects are of concern.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
Unknown 55 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 26%
Researcher 11 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Unspecified 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 14 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 16%
Unspecified 7 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 7 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2015.
All research outputs
#7,860,129
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,036
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,281
of 215,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#209
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.