↓ Skip to main content

Identifying Consensus Disease Pathways in Parkinson's Disease Using an Integrative Systems Biology Approach

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying Consensus Disease Pathways in Parkinson's Disease Using an Integrative Systems Biology Approach
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0016917
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yvonne J. K. Edwards, Gary W. Beecham, William K. Scott, Sawsan Khuri, Guney Bademci, Demet Tekin, Eden R. Martin, Zhijie Jiang, Deborah C. Mash, Jarlath ffrench-Mullen, Margaret A. Pericak-Vance, Nicholas Tsinoremas, Jeffery M. Vance

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) has had six genome-wide association studies (GWAS) conducted as well as several gene expression studies. However, only variants in MAPT and SNCA have been consistently replicated. To improve the utility of these approaches, we applied pathway analyses integrating both GWAS and gene expression. The top 5000 SNPs (p<0.01) from a joint analysis of three existing PD GWAS were identified and each assigned to a gene. For gene expression, rather than the traditional comparison of one anatomical region between sets of patients and controls, we identified differentially expressed genes between adjacent Braak regions in each individual and adjusted using average control expression profiles. Over-represented pathways were calculated using a hyper-geometric statistical comparison. An integrated, systems meta-analysis of the over-represented pathways combined the expression and GWAS results using a Fisher's combined probability test. Four of the top seven pathways from each approach were identical. The top three pathways in the meta-analysis, with their corrected p-values, were axonal guidance (p = 2.8E-07), focal adhesion (p = 7.7E-06) and calcium signaling (p = 2.9E-05). These results support that a systems biology (pathway) approach will provide additional insight into the genetic etiology of PD and that these pathways have both biological and statistical support to be important in PD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Germany 2 2%
Luxembourg 2 2%
United States 2 2%
China 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 92 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 23%
Student > Master 12 11%
Other 8 8%
Professor 6 6%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 13 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 11%
Computer Science 8 8%
Neuroscience 7 7%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 15 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2012.
All research outputs
#12,654,989
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#97,734
of 193,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,814
of 106,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#940
of 1,325 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,325 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.