You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Acceptance Factors of Mobile Apps for Diabetes by Patients Aged 50 or Older: A Qualitative Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medicine 2.0, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2196/med20.3912 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Madlen Scheibe, Julius Reichelt, Maike Bellmann, Wilhelm Kirch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 4 | 15% |
| Canada | 3 | 12% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 206 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 51 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 13% |
| Researcher | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 30 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 45 | 22% |
| Unknown | 44 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2015.
All research outputs
#1,135,282
of 25,964,892 outputs
Outputs from Medicine 2.0
#2
of 24 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,740
of 272,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medicine 2.0
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,964,892 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one scored the same or higher as 22 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them