↓ Skip to main content

WITHDRAWN: Anticonvulsants for cocaine dependence

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
WITHDRAWN: Anticonvulsants for cocaine dependence
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006754.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvia Minozzi, Laura Amato, Marina Davoli, Michael F Farrell, Anelise Arl Lima Reisser, Pier Paolo Pani, Mauricio Silva de Lima, Bernardo Go Soares, Simona Vecchi

Abstract

Cocaine dependence is a major public health problem that is characterized by recidivism and a host of medical and psychosocial complications. Although effective pharmacotherapy is available for alcohol and heroin dependence none exists currently for cocaine dependence despite two decades of clinical trials primarily involving antidepressant, anti convulsivant and dopaminergic medications. There has been extensive consideration of optimal pharmacological approaches to the treatment of cocaine dependence with consideration of both dopamine antagonists and agonists. Anticonvulsants have been candidates for the treatment of addiction based on the hypothesis that seizure kindling-like mechanisms contribute to addiction.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 5%
Argentina 1 5%
Unknown 19 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 19%
Professor 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 62%
Neuroscience 3 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 1 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2015.
All research outputs
#4,046,033
of 4,833,580 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,230
of 7,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,609
of 144,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#203
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,833,580 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.