↓ Skip to main content

Effect of ferrocene-substituted porphyrin RL-91 on Candida albicans biofilm formation

Overview of attention for article published in Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of ferrocene-substituted porphyrin RL-91 on Candida albicans biofilm formation
Published in
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, May 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.05.061
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rainer Lippert, Sandra Vojnovic, Aleksandra Mitrovic, Norbert Jux, Ivana Ivanović-Burmazović, Branka Vasiljevic, Nada Stankovic

Abstract

Ferrocene-substituted porphyrin RL-91 exhibits antifungal activity against opportune human pathogen Candida albicans. RL-91 efficiently inhibits growth of both planktonic C. albicans cells and cells within biofilms without photoactivation. The minimal inhibitory concentration for plankton form (PMIC) was established to be 100 μg/mL and the same concentration killed 80% of sessile cells in the mature biofilm (SMIC80). Furthermore PMIC of RL-91 efficiently prevents C. albicans biofilm formation. RL-91 is cytotoxic for human fibroblasts in vitro in concentration of 10 μg/mL, however it does not cause hemolysis in concentrations of up to 50 μg/mL. These findings open possibility for application of RL-91 as an antifungal agent for external antibiofilm treatment of medical devices as well as a scaffold for further development of porphyrin based systemic antifungals.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Lecturer 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 7 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 6 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 8 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters
#13,033
of 13,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,288
of 241,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters
#115
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,778 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.