↓ Skip to main content

Smoking and Multiple Sclerosis: An Updated Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
227 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
324 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Smoking and Multiple Sclerosis: An Updated Meta-Analysis
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0016149
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam E. Handel, Alexander J. Williamson, Giulio Disanto, Ruth Dobson, Gavin Giovannoni, Sreeram V. Ramagopalan

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a leading cause of disability in young adults. Susceptibility to MS is determined by environmental exposure on the background of genetic risk factors. A previous meta-analysis suggested that smoking was an important risk factor for MS but many other studies have been published since then.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 324 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 316 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 44 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 13%
Student > Master 40 12%
Researcher 35 11%
Student > Postgraduate 25 8%
Other 50 15%
Unknown 89 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 103 32%
Neuroscience 30 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 5%
Psychology 10 3%
Other 42 13%
Unknown 100 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,402,619
of 24,991,957 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#17,709
of 216,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,338
of 193,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#127
of 1,257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,991,957 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216,707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.